Opinion | Vietnam Is Emerging As A Safe And Robust Economy, While The United States Falters
Vietnam has quietly emerged as a stable and sustainable economic success story, with substantially lower risk of a major economic and currency crisis
There is a prevalent assumption by many investors that assets held in the United States and denominated in USD are a safe haven, and that investments in emerging countries such as Vietnam are riskier. In times of uncertainty, investors flee to perceived safety. I will demonstrate that the United States is something like a supposedly unsinkable ship headed for an iceberg, while Vietnam has quietly emerged as a stable and sustainable economic success story, with substantially lower risk of a major economic and currency crisis than the United States.
Throughout history, countries consistently go through certain cycles. Two cycles we will explore in this article are the long-term debt cycle regarding a country’s national debt and the associated monetary cycles, and also the wealth inequality cycle. In order to get a clearer picture of what is coming next, I’ve been studying extensively the writings of Ray Dalio, particularly his series The Changing World Order, which includes various chapters he has made available online. I’ve also studied a variety of other sources, which are hyperlinked in this article. Two books I’ve found particularly insightful for studying the past to better understand the future include The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century by Walter Scheidel, and Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari.
The United States’ national debt is 108% of GDP, double the 54% figure for Vietnam. Furthermore, recent tax cuts in the United States have led to a rapid increase in the annual budget deficit, and the budget deficit is projected to surge to $4.2 trillion in 2020 due to Covid-19. There is no viable plan in place for reducing this national debt through taxation, or for the United States federal government to start spending within its means, hence the only way out of this ultimately will be to print money, thereby honoring its obligations to bond holders, but debasing the value of the currency in the process. Indeed, the money printing presses have been fired up, and the United States is expected to print $3.5 trillion in new dollars in 2020.
The United States is at the end of its long-term debt cycle. This happens in countries approximately every 50-75 years when national debts become too massive to repay through taxation or finance through new debt issuances, and will normally lead to massive money printing to meet debt obligations. Since paper money is inherently worthless, the increased supply of currency will ultimately lead to significant inflation. When debt holders become aware that a country will be unable to honor its debt obligations by collecting money from tax income or issuing new debt, and will have to print money in order to honor its debt obligations, investors will not want to hold that debt or currency. There will be massive inflation and the value of the currency will collapse. There will ultimately be a restructuring of debts and the monetary system. For the United States, this could end its dominance as the world’s main reserve currency.
The debt and currency crisis periods are typically unexpected by most people at the end of the cycle as they have not lived through the collapse of the previous long-term debt cycle in their country 50-75 years earlier, and they don’t believe it will happen in their lifetime. Something unexpected might trigger it, for example a war or pandemic, or something else that interferes with a country’s ability to issue new debt.
These long-term debt cycles always happen in countries with high levels of national debt: It’s not a question of if, but when the cycle will end. The current long-term debt cycle in the United States, which started in 1945, has been 75 years, which is typically the longest that these cycles run. Meanwhile the United States’ national debt is at the high end of what countries can normally sustain.
When looking at it on a per capita basis, the story is even more bleak for the United States. If the United States were to try to collect this in taxes, it would be $80,158 per person (compared to $1,100 in Vietnam), equivalent to $208,411 per U.S. household.
One of the contributors to the United States high budget deficit is that it spends around 4% of GDP on the military, compared to just around 2% in Vietnam. Military spending is non-productive and leads to slower economic growth. Furthermore, the United States has a tendency to initiate foreign wars, which come with a huge price tag. The United States is estimated to have spent $6.4 trillion on foreign wars since 2001. In other words, 26% of the United States’ $24 trillion in national debt is the direct result of wars started by the United States since 2001. Imagine the cost if the United States were to fall into Thucydides Trap and get entangled in a war with China. In fact, an economic war between the United States and China has already commenced, and this is the first step to a military war.
Conversely, Vietnam does not go around the world starting wars in foreign countries, but rather utilizes its military for defensive purposes. Vietnam maintains no bases outside of its domestic territory.
Vietnam has maintained a trade surplus since 2012 whereas the United States has maintained a trade deficit. For the time being, the United States has been able to get the cash to finance its trade deficit through issuing bonds to foreign lenders and inbound foreign investment, but if the appetite for these assets diminishes, there will be extensive pressure on the USD. Conversely, Vietnam’s trade surplus enables the country to accumulate foreign currencies, which increases the supply of foreign currencies in Vietnam relative to demand for those in Vietnam, hence pushing up the value of VND relative to other currencies such as the USD.
Middle Class and Wealth Equality
In Walter Scheidel’s book The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century, he demonstrates a recurring wealth cycle throughout history, whereby during times of stability, large disparities between the wealthy and the poor gradually emerge and become unsustainable and invariably lead to collapse, and a redistribution of wealth. As power and wealth become increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small elite, the wealthy and powerful take measures to protect and concentrate their wealth and power. They may often use their political and military power to repress large groups who are seeking better living conditions or equality of opportunity. Eventually there will be such a large critical mass of people who are impoverished, who have been pushed down, and who face little or no economic and educational opportunity, that the system becomes highly unstable. When wealth inequality becomes so extreme like this, the system will eventually collapse, almost always violently or in the aftermath of great violence and destruction, usually in the form of war, revolution, state collapse or catastrophic plagues. These are the leveling events, which typically reduce wealth across the board and bring everyone down to the same level. Sometimes it involves a redistribution of land and other physical assets, especially in the aftermath of a revolution or war. Then the cycle repeats.
Some countries in the post World War 2 era have done better than others at engineering a robust middle class and took measures to prevent a rapid consolidation of wealth and power in the hands of the elite. For example, in the aftermath of World War 2, most Northern European countries as well as Japan redistributed wealth and deliberately created systems to ensure the emergence of a strong middle class. The architects of those post-WWII states understood that a strong middle class would be the basis for strong social stability.
The middle class in the United States is gradually shrinking, in part to due to the increasing costs of education, healthcare and housing. The real purchasing power of average wages in the United States has not increased over the last 40 years. In other words, for the typical American family, costs are going up but their income is not. In fact, by 2010 the United States already had the smallest middle class compared to countries in Western or Northern Europe. Meanwhile, wealth continues to consolidate within the top 1%, whose share of total income nearly tripled from 8% in 1973 to 22% by 2015, and which has likely accelerated after the tax cuts for the wealthy which were passed in 2017.
Most observers don’t believe that the rapid increase in wealth inequality in the United States will lead to some sort of collapse or re-levelling event as described by Walter Scheidel. However, as Yuval Noah Harari pointed out in his book Sapiens: “It is an iron rule of history that what looks inevitable in hindsight was far from obvious at the time.” He explains that social/political changes happen on a time scale which is slow enough that most people underestimate the risk of imminent collapse.
On the other hand, Vietnam has done an excellent job building a strong and rapidly growing middle class in the aftermath of a series of devastating wars, the most recent being the American war in Vietnam, a massive levelling event that left the whole country impoverished by the war’s end in 1975.
Vietnam has an extraordinarily high level of home ownership at around 90%, making it one of the highest in the world. This contrasts with home ownership levels of around 65% in the United States. Furthermore, few Vietnamese families have mortgages, and therefore the risk of being forced to sell their properties is low. A high rate of home ownership is a strong foundation for a middle class to emerge, especially in Asia where real estate prices tend to rise substantially as the economies develop.
The result of this is that while the gap between the wealthy and poor is growing both in Vietnam and in the United States, the gap is much bigger in the United States than in Vietnam. In the United States, the wealthiest 10% make 18x the income of the poorest 10%, whereas in Vietnam the wealthiest 10% make 11x the income of the poorest 10%.
As Walter Scheidel and others have shown, when the gap between the wealthy and the poor becomes too great, especially when so much of a country’s wealth is held by a very small percent of the population, the system becomes increasingly unstable until there is a re-leveling event, which almost always is violent.
We are witnessing more and more signs of social instability in United States, such as mass protests, in which traditionally oppressed groups are drawing attention to the difficult situations they face and the wide range of structural disadvantages faced by blacks and other minority groups (education, healthcare, job opportunities, police treatment & justice, voter suppression, etc.)
Along with home ownership, a strong educational system and equality of educational opportunities is a pillar of a strong and stable society.
Vietnam takes education seriously, with the Vietnamese government continuously taking measures to improve the quality of, and access to, education in Vietnam. Public education in Vietnam is affordable for the middle and lower class.
Meanwhile, the United States has been shifting the costs of education from state governments to the students’ families while education costs have increased, making it especially difficult for poorer students to obtain equality in educational opportunities in contrast to students from wealthier families who can afford the high price of education, or who live in wealthier locations which collect more taxes for education spending.
As a country, Vietnam has a high level of interest in, and openness to, scientific expertise and takes nationally coordinated measures to continuously improve its education outcomes. According to the World Bank, in Vietnam and China, students from poorer households do as well, if not better, in both math and science, as compared to average students in the OECD.
In the United States, interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) has been declining precipitously. Meanwhile there is a growing anti-science movement in the United States, as demonstrated by the large numbers of Americans who deny climate change, anti-vaxxers, people who don’t believe the evidence pointing to evolution, and now people who refuse to self-isolate and wear masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. Imagine if the United States had quickly dealt with the facts of Covid-19 in January 2020 like Vietnam did, perhaps they would only have 430 cases like Vietnam, rather than 4.3 million cases they are facing (10,000 times more cases than Vietnam).
Vietnam is already scoring higher than the United States on standardized tests of educational attainment, especially in math and science.
Stability in GDP Growth
GDP is a highly imperfect measure and doesn’t take into account the long-term sustainability of a country’s growth. Nonetheless, the resilience of Vietnam’s GDP growth over the last 20 years, in the face of a variety of international crises which have several times pushed the United States into recessions, demonstrates the robustness of Vietnam’s economy.
Given Vietnam’s substantially lower levels of national debt, much stronger balance of trade, robust and growing middle class and better educational outcomes, Vietnam looks forward to a future of robust economic growth and stability, whereas the United States faces increasing risks of a major crisis, very likely involving hyperinflation, and possibly much worse.